Drinking a cup of coffee and voicing an opinion, Quintessentially American

There are some things, which are mutually exclusive in their current state. A truth & a lie. A Christian & an Atheist. An American & an Obama supporter. IF you were to mutate the American, I suppose they could exist as an Obama supporter, however the principles of Socialism contradict the Rights enumerated in the Constitution, so there is no way a "loyal American" could ever support a "Socialist president", therefore it becomes an oxymoron.

Showing posts with label 2nd Amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2nd Amendment. Show all posts

Saturday, May 1, 2010

Solidarity for Arizona

Let me be crystal clear: I support Legal Immigration to America.

The operative word here is LEGAL.

All the brouhaha is nothing but a smokescreen to rile up the illegals so they can be used to put pressure on Arizona. It is like giving the Indians "firewater" in the old west days and then get them on a "War Path".

People who are running on pure emotion are much more easily manipulated and can be used to promote an agenda.

Out of the woodwork come the entertainers with their opinions, most against Arizona's new Immigration Law. I am glad they are doing so. Now I can see who to boycott.

On the subject of boycotts, Hispanics and others are threatening to boycott Arizona until they rescind the law. I am urging all supporters of Arizona to visit the Arizona Chamber of Commerce link and then the city Chambers of Commerce and urge you to do as much business over the Internet with Arizona's American owned businesses as you can.

Americans across the nation must come and show solidarity for Arizona. The eyes of the nation, even the world, are watching what is happening here. They are watching to see what Obama will do, what Mexico will do, if there will be a border war ignited over this, or whether there will be a type of Civil War between illegals & their sympathizers and patriotic Americans.

If there was some sort of skirmish, even on a small scale, would it be enough for Obama to declare Martial Law, just in time to freeze November elections in order to avoid a Democratic bloodbath at the polls?

Even Obama knows the pot is simmering and could boil over.
"President Barack Obama said Saturday that partisan rants and name-calling under the guise of legitimate discourse pose a serious danger to America's democracy, and may incite "extreme elements" to violence."
Which extreme elements, the illegals who are trespassing on American soil or patriotic Americans, defenders of the Constitution and States Rights? How can a president incite people to not follow a state's law? How can a president make ignorant statements about a law, which clearly provides proof he does not know what he is talking about? Well, he did this during the campaign with his "57 states" comment so I guess we shouldn't be surprised.

"You can imagine, if you are a Hispanic American in Arizona ..." the president said Tuesday at a campaign-style appearance in Iowa, "suddenly, if you don't have your papers and you took your kid out to get ice cream, you're going to be harassed." --How Obama could lose Arizona immigration battle by Bryon York
If he would have read the Bill, he would know that this will not be the case. The police have better things to do than stand around and wait for a brown-skinned person to walk into view so they can ask to see his papers. Now if the brown-skinned person was involved in a crime, then, if the police thought the person was illegal, then they would ask. Or maybe during an investigation of MS-13 gang members or theft, assault, rape, drunk driving, and other such crimes.

Already an AZ Deputy was shot and 17 suspected illegals caught while looking for the men who shot him. Are the illegals in this country so ignorant that they cannot see they have brought the wrath of Americans upon themselves with their actions?

Not all Hispanics are against Arizona's attempt to protect its citizens. There is still some common sense left:



The biased media would have you believe that no one in America supports the new law in Arizona, but nothing could be farther from the truth. 64% of Arizona's citizens and 51% of Americans favored the new bill. "In the same survey, 76% of respondents told Rasmussen that it is more important to gain control of the border than it is to legalize the status of undocumented workers."

There is an online petition, "We Stand With Arizona, and Against Illegal Immigration" where you can sign and leave a comment. Most everyone welcomes LEGAL immigrants but they are opposed to this government supported silent invasion of ILLEGAL aliens. If you are so inclined, please visit the site and sign the petition, which now has 19,974 signatures.

Of the four states which border Mexico, why is Arizona the only one to make it mandatory for employers to use E-Verify? This is a FREE service and is available in all 50 States.

Map of States with Mandatory E-Verify Laws

Listen to Roy Beck of NumbersUSA. He points out that there are 7 million illegals holding down jobs in the construction, trades and service industry. That these are jobs unemployed Americans could and should have.



With all the "normal" day-to-day crime, add in the spillover from Mexico's drug wars and kidnapping trade, and now the anger over this new piece of legislation, it is a wonderful thing that Gov. Brewer signed into law a bill allowing AZ citizens to carry concealed weapons WITHOUT requiring a permit, making Arizona the third state, behind Alaska and Vermont, to do so. I think the citizens are going to need it.

Saturday, June 13, 2009

"Gun Confiscation Act"

The Founding Fathers, having just come through a bloody revolution for the Rights and freedoms we as Americans enjoy today, wanted to make sure their posterity would always be able to protect themselves from a tyrannical government. To this end, they created the 2nd Amendment, not to protect the people from foreign invaders, but to protect the people from any administration or military who would seek to usurp the freedoms just won.

"The said constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." -- Samuel Adams


We continuously look back to the original intent of the Founders because they lived with real freedom, fought for that freedom therefore we respect their sacrifices, and because it is a real possibility their generation was the ONLY generation to live out the full fruits of their victory.

With each generation afterwards, we have lost their victory, by bits and pieces at first and then rapidly, beginning in 1861 with the Lincoln Administration.

Since 1913, we have been losing these freedoms by leaps and bounds. I suspect it is due to the [intentional] dumbing down of Americans, who today have no idea what is written in THEIR Constitution, who the Founders were, why the colonist even wanted to go to war with King George or why Socialism is viewed as a bad idea by many of the older generation.

Through out history, the world has seen certain patterns of behaviors in leaders who seek to have absolute rule over the people.

In a free society, government leaders value transparency in the process, free markets, which will correct themselves without manipulation, and the ablility of a person to go where they please as long as they don't harm anothers person, property or family. Where you can be anything and do anything without restraints so long as you harm no one else in the process.

You want to own a gun? Fine! Be responsible for it.

You want to own 20 guns? Fine! Be responsible for them.

All dictators and dictatorial governments start out by creating a "boogie-man", creating fear, and then tell the people they must surrender some of their rights so the great and wonderful government can protect them. BALONEY!

"False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Can it be supposed that those who have the courage to violate the most sacred laws of humanity, the most important of the code, will respect the less important and arbitrary ones, which can be violated with ease and impunity, and which, if strictly obeyed, would put an end to personal liberty... and subject innocent persons to all the vexations that the guilty alone ought to suffer? Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man. They ought to be designated as laws not preventive but fearful of crimes, produced by the tumultuous impression of a few isolated facts, and not by thoughtful consideration of the inconveniences and advantages of a universal decree." -- Cesare Beccaria


All we need do is to remember the stages taken by such men as Mussolini, Stalin, Hitler, Lenin, and look at the current list of the World's Worst Dictators

In most every situation, the people were brainwashed into handing over their security to the government, they allowed guns to be registered and then later these were confiscated. A dictator will find it hard, if not impossible to usurp control over the people as long as they have the means to defend themselves.

"[The program of American disarmament outlined in State Department Paper 7277] is the fixed, determined and approved policy of the government of the United States." -- Joseph Clark, (D) Senator, Pennsylvania, 1961


Enter Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act of 2009. Introduced in Jan 2009 and referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security in Feb.

To provide for the implementation of a system of licensing for purchasers of certain firearms and for a record of sale system for those firearms, and for other purposes.
SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

(a) In General- In this Act:

(2) QUALIFYING FIREARM- The term `qualifying firearm' has the meaning given the term in section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, as amended by subsection (b) of this section.

(b) Amendment to Title 18, United States Code- Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

`(36) The term `qualifying firearm'--

`(A) means--

`(i) any handgun; or


If people do not begin to understand what is happening before their eyes, then I don't see how there can be any hope to preserve the United States of America.

Every military person, every law enforcement person and believe it or not, every elected official take an Oath to Protect and Defend or Protect and Support the Constitution of the United States. Based on their actions, I don't see how it is possible for them to understand what that Oath meant when they sit by and allow obvious encroachments and the erosion of our freedoms...all in the name of "political correctness" or [false] necessity.

Our law enforcement personnel (the Constitution is the Supreme Law in America but they don't even understand it) and our military, instead of being the bulwark of the citizens are now the means to crush those who are trying to alert the sleeping population!

Let your Representatives know how you feel about this bill. Tell them to not support or vote for this Act

"The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers delegated directly to the citizen, and is excepted out of the general powers of government. A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power." -- Cockrum v. State,24 Tex.394, at 401-402 (1859)

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Catch All Friday

Letterman
Lots of talk about D. Letterman's remark concerning Sarah Palin's daughter. Seems he was attempting to be funny, stated a rather distasteful and greatly revealing sexist comment...a "joke" he called it.

Has Letterman hit the bottom of his game? Apparently so and his strange sense of humor appears to be the evidence.

Stop while you still have room to get up Dave.

(Let CBS know how you feel.)



WorldNet Daily
Many of you probably know about the "Where's the Birth Certificate" campaign by Joseph Farah, editor and chief executive officer of WND. What some of you may not know is that CBS Outdoor and now Lamar Outdoor have both banned putting up the signs.

This is still America, at least for a little while longer, so they can do this if they want. And their customers can find another sign company with whom to spend their advertising dollars. This is exactly what Florida real estate company owner and radio talk show host Fabian Calvo did. He pulled his account with Lamar and is looking into alternatives.

Good for Mr. Calvo and here's a "swift boot in the backside" to both outdoor advertising companies.

If you would like to send Lamar Outdoor a message letting them know "NO! The issue IS NOT settled!", please do! (I did!)

Send to:
kpoche@lamar.com (National sales inquiries)
or by Phone: 1-800-235-2627 (Corporate)
or Fax: (225) 926-1005 (Executive)

HR 1207 - Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2009
Dr. Ron Paul of Texas has introduced this bill, commonly known a the "Audit the Fed Bill". The bill needed 218 co-sponsors and tonight Ron Paul's website posted they have 222! THOMAS is reporting 221 as of a few seconds ago.(3:45am CT)

Is the Federal Reserve finally going to be fully audited?

"Them Jews"
Recall August 2006 when Mel Gibson (Producer: "The Passion of the Christ"-2004 & "Apocalypto"-2006), during his DUI traffic stop, rattled off some "anti-Jewish" comments. Most everyone was up-in-arms and most certainly the Jewish community.

Here comes Obama's former religious mentor, the infamous Rev. Jeremiah Wright:

"Them Jews ain't going to let him talk to me. I told my baby daughter that he'll talk to me in five years when he's a lame duck, or in eight years when he's out of office," Wright told the Daily Press of Newport News


Lord, I pray he isn't in office for 8 years! But this does help to explain his anti-Israel position. Wright later apologized but once out, the words can't be taken back...right Mel?

PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT: Out of Ammo?
Wasn't too many weeks ago you couldn't find a bullet. Any bullet. People were buying ammo like it was going out of style. Or fix'in to get federally kidnapped.

If you are looking for some, I hear these folks have plenty:

LUCKY GUNNER

Sunday, April 19, 2009

April 19th Should be a National Holiday

From the beginning of America, April 19th has hosted important events.

It was on this day in 1775 that Capt. John Parker, minuteman commanding the militia, ordered his men not to fire on the British Regulars fast approaching unless fired upon first. The British were coming because the militia, with the help of local colonist had been stockpiling weapons (cannons, powder, muskets), food, and who knew what else.

The British soldiers had been ordered by King George to stop the insolent colonist who had already demonstrated, via the Boston Tea party, that they had had enough of government intrusion into their lives.

When the Regulars arrived, they made the historically famous mistake of demanding from the militia their weapons and supplies. Of course the militia had no intention of giving up their weapons. When they resisted, a British soldier fired a shot and the rest is history.

In 1933, the beginning of the financial end of America was initiated by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who in his infinite wisdom, decided America didn't need to be on the Gold Standard and made his announcement. Why the people didn't stand up then, I don't know. Perhaps they were just too busy trying to survive the depression to worry about what Washington DC was up too.

It was on this date in 1939 when Connecticut decided it was time to join with other states and voted to approve the Bill of Rights. Was it that it just took Connecticut this long to get around to it, or was this an attempt to quietly remedy an embarrassing situation? After all, they joined the United States in 1788, what had they been doing for protection under the B.o.R. since then?

1993, Waco Texas. The Branch Davidian, had been stockpiling food supplies, weapons, ammunition (sound strangely familiar?) to the discontent of the Federal Government, and came under siege by the ATF, FBI and eventually the US military. Texas Gov. Ann Richards gives official approval for President Clinton, through Attorney General Janet Reno, to violate the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 and send in Delta Force to deal with the civilians. The resulting death of women and children would earn Reno the appropriate nickname "The Butcher of Waco".

See Waco: A New Revelation Part 1 and Part 2

In 1995, a cow-poop bomb supposedly blew up the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in OKC, all by it's self. We are suppose to believe that countless news reporters, First Responders and even the Bomb Squad, all had mass hallucinations as to the bombs going off as had been reported. Read State Representative Charles Key's letter to the House Of Representatives .

April 19th should be a day of remembrance for all freedom fighters in America. Remembering the people can not trust the government, the people can never, NEVER give up their 2nd Amendment, and that the people must band together, stand together and let the world know we are not domestic terrorist as labeled by some in our government, but we are Americans, in the truest sense of the word.